If you’ve ever wondered how institutions seem to “know” where price will revert before major moves, the answer often lies in Fair Value Gaps.
Plazo Sullivan’s methodology emphasizes that Fair Value Gaps act as magnets—not because retail traders watch them, but because institutions must mitigate the imbalance they caused.
Understanding the Anatomy of an FVG
An FVG forms when the market displaces violently in one direction, preventing the opposite side from offering liquidity at fair value.
The Institutional Logic Behind FVGs
This creates natural magnets: price will typically revisit these imbalances to test, mitigate, or confirm order flow.
The FVG Trading Model Used by Elite Traders
Look for Strong Institutional Moves
Displacement confirms website that institutional activity caused the imbalance.
Outline the Exact Imbalance Zone
This is the region where price is likely to return.
Patience Creates Precision
Institutions use these pullbacks to reload positions at favorable pricing.
Bias Before Execution
Plazo Sullivan Roche Capital’s bias framework—weekly, daily, liquidity mapping—acts as the filter that upgrades an FVG from “possible” to “high-probability.”
Imbalances Work Both Ways
Just as price gravitates back to FVGs for entries, it also moves toward FVGs when they act as future magnets.
Why FVG Trading Works
Fair Value Gaps give traders a rare glimpse into algorithmic intent.
Combine FVG logic with market structure, liquidity pools, and volume confirmation, and you have one of the strongest frameworks available to retail traders today—one that aligns perfectly with the advanced methodologies taught inside Plazo Sullivan Roche Capital.
FVGs aren’t signals—they’re context.
And once you learn their language, the market starts to speak back.